Frequently Asked Questions
If you can’t find an answer, just send us a message.
Why did you choose a foundation structure rather than an association, cooperative, or company?
A foundation offers legal permanence, asset‑locks, and independence from individual members, shareholders, or founders. This structure ensures land and purpose cannot be redirected, sold, or captured if people, finances, or circumstances change. It is the most robust vehicle available for intergenerational stewardship.
What happens to the land if the Foundation were ever to fail financially or dissolve?
The Foundation’s statutes include binding provisions that ensure protected land cannot return to speculation. In dissolution scenarios, land must be transferred to another entity bound by the same mission, asset‑lock, and guardianship principles. The land remains protected regardless of the Foundation’s operational continuity.
Who ultimately controls decisions about land?
No single person, donor, Guardian, or institution controls land decisions. Authority is deliberately distributed across statutory governance bodies, legal safeguards, and oversight mechanisms. Guardians care for land in practice, but the Foundation retains ultimate custodial responsibility to protect purpose and continuity.
How do you prevent donors or funders from influencing land use or governance?
Funding and decision‑making are structurally separated. Donors have no operational or governance control over land, Guardianship Agreements, or strategic decisions. Ethical financing rules, conflict‑of‑interest policies, and independent oversight bodies prevent financial capture or influence.
What exactly do GROVE contributions fund — and what do they not fund?
GROVE contributions fund the Foundation’s core custodial infrastructure: legal protection, governance, monitoring, training, and accountability. They do not fund Guardian operations, livelihoods, or land‑based enterprises once Guardianship Agreements are signed. This separation protects integrity, discipline, and trust.
Why don’t you fund Guardian projects directly?
Direct operational funding would blur accountability and create dependency. Instead, Guardians are expected to build viable livelihoods over time. Where appropriate, they may access capital through independently managed funds, separate from the Foundation, ensuring clarity between stewardship, finance, and oversight.
How do you measure whether regeneration is actually happening?
The Foundation uses a multi‑dimensional returns framework that tracks ecological, social, economic, and institutional value over time. This includes qualitative and quantitative indicators, baseline assessments, monitoring cycles, and learning reviews. Reporting focuses on long‑term resilience, not short‑term outputs.
What kind of reporting can supporters expect?
Supporters receive transparency appropriate to their relationship: financial reporting, governance disclosures, monitoring summaries, and learning reflections. Reporting prioritises clarity and honesty over marketing — including challenges, adaptations, and lessons learned.
Is this model compatible with public authorities and regulation?
Yes. The Foundation is fully compliant with Portuguese law, submits statutory reports, and works in dialogue with municipalities and public bodies. The model complements — rather than replaces — public regulation by providing long‑term custodial capacity where markets and short cycles fall short.
Can landowners remain involved after donating land?
Yes, where appropriate. Donors may remain connected through legacy intentions, participation in learning, or community engagement — provided this does not compromise governance independence or Guardianship integrity. Each situation is shaped through dialogue and formalised agreements.
Who can become a Guardian, and how are they selected?
Anyone may begin the journey individually. Guardianship of Foundation strategic land requires a trained, certified Guardian Entity (minimum three people) that demonstrates ecological, social, and collective readiness. Selection is based on capability, alignment, and long‑term commitment — not speed or ambition.
What happens if a Guardian Entity fails or conflicts arise?
Guardians operate with autonomy, but not without accountability. The Foundation monitors commitments, supports remediation, and intervenes if necessary. If obligations cannot be met, the Foundation can revoke agreements and appoint new Guardians. Guardians may change; the land’s protection does not.
How do you manage conflicts of interest within governance?
All board members and advisors are bound by disclosure and recusal rules. Guardians cannot oversee their own agreements. Donors hold no governance authority over land. Independent strategic, technical, and financial oversight bodies provide checks and balances across domains.
Are contribution amounts fixed, and why are ranges indicative?
Ranges are indicative to provide orientation, not obligation. Commitments are shaped through conversation, alignment, and ethical review. This flexibility respects different contexts while ensuring relationships remain values‑led rather than transactional.
How is this different from conservation NGOs or project‑based regeneration?
Fundação Terra Agora is not primarily a project operator or grant‑maker. It is a custodial institution designed to hold land, responsibility, and learning over decades. The focus is not on delivering projects, but on creating conditions where regeneration can endure across generations.